
THE SEGREGATION OF THE MAN AS A COMPONENT OF THE PARENTAL UNIT
This starts from the first visit to the doctor's office with your pregnant girlfriend, fiancee or wife...whichever applies to you. If you think I'm bullshittin', understand that I've personally gone through this 4 times now. It doesn't matter that this last time was via an interracial union...the story remains the same.
The nurses in the office do NOT respect your position as the man of the relationship....the very reason why this girl is even in the office to begin with. They rarely acknowledge to you. They don't speak you unless they are asking you to go sit in the lobby or the waiting area. Bullshit. I'm there to support every aspect of this pregnancy. Why should I have to be away from my girl when she wants and needs me there? The nurses act like you have no reason to be there.
It only gets worse from here.
Should things not work out between you and your the mother of your child and a split is unavoidable, more than likely, your path will lead you to some court of law where you will see just how unbalanced the laws are in favor of the mother. The man gets the shaft most often than not. Currently, I am going through a situation where I'm being obligated to pay my 2nd "babymama's" child support for a son that she refuses to let me see. She tells me that he doesn't know me and that she's not going to "do this" to him. When I last spoke to him on Thanksgiving, he started crying in the phone because he misses his daddy. She is clearly using him as a pawn. The law lets her get away with this. We both created him.....it was I who determined what sex he eventually was due to the chromosome (biology talk which I will not go into here, but the MAN determines the sex of the child).....all a woman does is carry and birth the child. Sounds like it is a combined effort to bring a child into the world. So why must I go through the process of legitimization alone? Why must I be held responsible to provide child support, yet not have equal parental rights? It's not fair. Everyone, even those in the judicial system knows it's not fair. Why isn't anything being done about this to even the playing field?
Well, as I understand it now, during the process of determining child support, now BOTH parties income is factored in. Before then, a woman could be working a regular 9 to 5, getting money from her NEW man and the father would still be responsible for providing child support for a child who more than likely didn't even need it OR even saw a dime of it. Now, I am not saying that a father shouldn't provide for his children, but the point of the entire thing is to ensure that the child is taken care of financially. If a mother has that already, what then is the point? The courts have lost sight of that and has used child support as a means of exacting punishment against the father and given unnecessary power to the mother. Too many times women have had children as a way to receive a payday and most often than not, monies received in child support are never used to support the child. Don't forget that we are talking about a gender that for the most part lives to shop. Do not be blind to this fact. I've seen my fair share of women using child support money to buy themselves new shoes, clothes and whatever in the hell else that they want because the child has already been taken care of. Even this is not fair. To use child support to "replenish" the mother's pocketbook just because she has used her money on the child.....I find a bit of fault in that from this perspective: are we absolving the mother from having to also provide child support from a monetary position?? Are we saying that the father is the only way required to PAY MONEY? That roof that is currently over the child's head would already be there regardless of if the child was born or not, so how is that truly providing child support from the mother's perspective? You can't use this argument. The woman using child support money to pay the cable or internet bill is NOT providing child support in the technical sense. That is a luxury that she benefits from more than the child. Again, you can't use this argument. The child would prosper just the same WITHOUT it.
What's even worse than all of this is the fact that when this woman goes out to place a father on child support, she is usually scorned and bitter over whatever went wrong in the relationship and now all of a sudden, it's mandatory that the father now be held responsible for providing support for the child. OK, I get that. So why not put a father on child support FROM DAY ONE? They wait until the relationship deteriorates and
then the mother wants to get the last punch in and walk away unscathed, to wait on their eventual payday? The mother goes to the local child support or DFACS office and goes through the process only to wind up not receiving full compensation because she was too stupid to realize that this is a service provided to assist her meaning, they ain't gonna do the shit for free! That's right. The money that they are trying to take from the father.....there's a portion of that going to the same office that they ran to for help. So now, that too is the father's fault! Back to my 2nd "babymama"......this idiot attempted to place me on child support once I become involved in another relationship after she clearly showed that she didn't want to be with me and raise our son together. She made it clear through a series of events......putting me out of her car in the middle of the street, not once but twice, locking my personal belongings up in her apartment, disappearing and not answering her phone, numerous times where she kicked me out of her apartment only to get mad when a chick came to pick me up (not understanding that one at all!), purposely starting fights and the all important stabbing that led her to be charged with aggravated assault ($20,000 bond) to which I never pursued OR pressed charges only because she was pregnant with my boy. The second I got with my current girlfriend, fiancee and soon to be mother of my 4th child, what do you know?? Here comes the child support order! LMAO! Things is, I was already on child support from the mother of my first two kids. I wasn't working and still not due in part to my criminal record and this ever-loving economy. She already knew well in advance about my first child support order, so why did she play herself and go in there to exact revenge on me? Because I wasn't generating any income, her order came out to be $120 a month. Is it any surprise that she got PISSED when she got (let her tell it) a $19 check for child support?? Of course, that too was my fault. If she hates me so much, can anyone reading this tell me why this dumb bitch still tries to come to every family event and function that my family has? She forces it down everyone's throat that she and my son are a "package deal". She is jealous and scorned that I have moved on and now have the family life that I had been wanting. In her own words, she said this past Christmas in front of my mother and aunt that "she got the short end of the stick". What in the fuck does that mean??
OK, I've gotten a bit off of the subject, but it is a RANT.....
At least you can hopefully see where I was going with this entire subject. Men and fathers are getting shitted on and we take it because we have no rights or anyone fighting for us. It starts almost from the beginning and it becomes a neverending losing battle. Ideally, I would like to get together with other fathers who are going through similar issues along with lawmakers, politicians, attorneys, lawyers, news media and anyone who can help to correct these problems. All it takes is for one man to take a stand against the injustice.